Watch Reviews
ref. 3510.50 / 3520.50 — Is the New Omega Speedmaster 38 the Modern 'Reduced'?
The Speedmaster “Reduced” label covers automatic Speedmasters with cases smaller than the 42mm Speedmaster Professional, first launched in the late 1980s and including refs. 3510.50 and 3520.50. Worn & Wound asked whether Omega’s new Speedmaster 38 occupies that same niche.
By HorologyTalk Editorial · · 3 min read
Originally reported by Worn & Wound. This article is a curated summary of their original coverage.
ref. 3510.50 and 3520.50 — a short history
The term "Speedmaster Reduced" is not a single reference but a family: automatic Speedmasters with cases smaller than the 42mm Speedmaster Professional. That family began in the late 1980s and spans a dizzying array of references, the best-known being the ref. 3510.50 and ref. 3520.50.
What Worn & Wound asked
Worn & Wound reviewed the new Speedmaster 38 and posed a direct question: does this new model functionally replace or reimagine the Reduced line? They framed the comparison around the two defining axes of the Reduced identity—case size below the Professional’s 42mm and automatic movements—rather than nostalgic branding alone.
Why the comparison matters
The Reduced label historically signaled two things at once: a smaller footprint on the wrist and an automatic calibre under the dial. That combination changed how the Speedmaster wore and how owners used it. The 42mm Professional kept the manual-wind pedigree and a certain tool-watch character; the Reduced broadened the Speedmaster audience by offering different ergonomics and convenience.
Design continuity and divergence
Across the Reduced family there’s familiar Speedmaster DNA, but also a lot of variation. Some references leaned dressier, others stayed sporty. The relevant question for the Speedmaster 38 is whether it prioritizes the Reduced’s compact, automatic identity or if it’s a new read on Speedmaster proportions and aesthetics. As Worn & Wound first reported, that framing is central to any meaningful comparison.
Practical buying angle
If you own or covet refs. 3510.50/3520.50 because you want a smaller, automatic Speedmaster, then the key takeaway is functional: compare wrist presence and movement type rather than marketing. Read hands-on reviews like Worn & Wound’s for feel and fit; those impressions matter more than labels when you’re choosing between a classic Reduced and a fresh 38-series option.
Open question for the market
Will collectors accept the Speedmaster 38 as the modern Reduced or regard it as a separate line? That will come down to how closely it matches the Reduced’s practical attributes—size and automatic winding—rather than what Omega calls it. Watch the hands-on reportage and secondary-market response; those will settle whether the Reduced legacy lives on in the 38.
Originally reported by Worn & Wound. This article is a curated summary of their original coverage.
Tags: Omega, chronograph, automatic